ziefi

Update of "RiskVsReward"
Login

Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login to enable hyperlinks.

Overview

Artifact ID: 162072c5d64cb2b8bc5589de301ce0b6dc38ca3bb4b33a8a260635d4fd390b3e
Page Name:RiskVsReward
Date: 2021-06-13 02:36:05
Original User: zie
Mimetype:text/x-markdown
Parent: 32ff04747644f1e965c049c466a53b53b1dd886e3cfe04eea112f9d6b7757465 (diff)
Next f3bd73fff1422ab54ada69c1c02e8a7d7cd90ac595a68a4f572e5dfe0660168b
Content

When it comes to Investing, we should talk about risk vs reward.

YOLO

If we are truly YOLO'ng, then we should go for the largest reward and ignore the risk?

So, we should do something epic, like rob Fort Knox. Ft. Knox currently holds 147.3 million ounces of gold.

147.3 million ounces * 1880.15 USD per ounce = $276,946,095,000 USD.

That's about 277 Billion dollars. That's more than Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk. Of course the worst case risks are death or life in prison with a severe disability(getting shot and permanently injured).

Obviously all sorts of illegal things can get you basically the same risks, with probably less reward. If you are willing to accept these risks, then have fun, though I don't wish you luck.

If that's not your cup of tea, then, let's try something a bit more legal.

Entrepreneur

You could be an entrepreneur, and go forth and try to be the next Bezos, Musk or Rockefeller. The risks are much less dire, the consequences might be as bad as being very in debt, ridiculously less risky than robbing Fort Knox.

Obviously this isn't for everyone, and very few succeed to the level of Musk/Bezos, etc.

Concentrated Stocks / Gambling

Let's get into investing now :) The more concentrated your stock position, the high the risk and higher possible reward. Of course the worst case is the stock goes to zero and you lose your investment. Compared to the YOLO option, this looks positively awesome! and compared to the entrepreneur, you end up at zero, not ridiculously in debt(unless you borrowed to invest in the stock, then the risks are basically the same).

Note I also said Gambling, and while Gambling is more risky than say a 1 stock portfolio, they are mostly equal. The best case scenario in gambling is a 50/50 chance. Any given stock is well less than that. Of the some 4k publicly traded stocks in the US, roughly 20% of them account for all the gains. So you have roughly a 20% chance of winning best case. Or roughly 800 stocks out of the 4k account for basically all the gains in a given year.

In 2020, NVAX had a 2,549% growth year. $10,000 in NVAX invested Jan 2020 would be worth $280,176 Jan of 2021, 1 year later. Of course who had any idea in Jan of 2020 that a Biotech Vaccine company would be the giant winner a year later? In March 2020, of course, but in January? Nobody.

So maybe gambling is better than investing in stocks.. 20% winning odds are pretty terrible.

Stocks

Of course there is another game in town, just own all the stocks. If you do that, historically you get about 10%/yr growth; averaged over multiple decades. Of course there is risk.

The risks:

So just own the about 9,000 publicly traded stocks in the world with something like VT (Though in Taxable accounts for US investors I recommend holding the constituent parts, roughly 60% VTI and 40% VXUS for tax reasons).

There are great ways to handle Volatility risk(like owning safer assets also), but that's a different topic.